About This Blog
Summaries and analysis of recent Delaware court decisions concerning business-related litigation.
Subscribe to Blog
JDSupra RSS
Join us on LinkedIn
Follow us on TwitterTopics
Top Posts
- Chancery Finds Stockholder Conferred a Substantial Corporate Benefit by Challenging the Joint Vote of Two Classes of Common Stock under Section 242(b)(2) of the DGCL
- Chancery Finds Plaintiff Failed To State A Non-Exculpated Claim Against Special Committee Defendants In Complaint Challenging A Merger
- Court of Chancery Awards Plaintiffs Attorneys’ Fees and Costs in Section 225 Action for Obtaining a Substantial Benefit for the Corporation and its Stockholders
Top News
Archives
Morris James Blogs
Court Of Chancery Explains Pro Se Procedure
Posted In Jurisdiction
Alfred v Walt Disney Co., C.A. 10211-VCG (January 14, 2015)
This decision has generated a lot of comment about the plaintiff's outlandish complaint. However, it is also a good source on Delaware law dealing with how to treat pro se complaints, particularly what leniency they will receive. Note as well the kindness of the Court to this litigant, which is to be commended.
Share
awards
US News Best Law Firms
JD Supra Readers Choice Award
Delaware Today Top Lawyers
Super Lawyers