Chuck Kunz and Ian McCauley Published in Cybersecurity Law & Strategy

Posted In Articles, News

cyber securityChuck Kunz and Ian McCauley authored an article titled "Vendor Contracting for Privacy and Security" which was published in Cybersecurity Law & Strategy.  The article addresses the data security and privacy issues that may arise during contract negotiations between vendors and businesses.  The article focuses on various hypothetical scenarios and the issues that businesses and vendors must identify prior to executing any agreement.

Chuck is a partner in the firm’s Bankruptcy Group and co-chairs the firm’s Data Privacy and Information Governance Group.  He is a Certified Information Privacy Professional/US (CIPP/US) and is a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP).  Chuck is a frequent author and speaker on topics relating to privacy, data management, and recent developments in Delaware law and legislation relating to these issues.

Ian is an attorney in the firm’s Corporate and Commercial Litigation Group and is also Morris James’ eDiscovery Coordinator.  His practice is focused on electronic discovery from the anticipation to the conclusion of litigation.  He is also a member of the firm’s Data Privacy and Information Governance Group.  Ian frequently speaks on all aspects of the electronic discovery process.

Click here to read the full article.

Looking Back on 2015: The 6 Most Important eDiscovery Cases in Delaware - Part 4

This is the fourth in a series of posts summarizing the six most important eDiscovery cases in Delaware in 2015.

Medicalgorithmics S.A. v. AMI Monitoring, Inc., C.A. No. 10948-CB, Oral Argument on Defendants’ Motion Regarding Plaintiff’s Improper Document Production, Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Defendants to Supplement Their Deficient Document Production, Discovery Issue Regarding Location of Depositions and Rulings of the Court, July 15, 2015.

This case dealt with cross-motions regarding deficient document productions in which the Plaintiff argued Defendants produced too few documents and Defendants argued Plaintiff produced too many. More ›

Ian D. McCauley To Present “The Art of the Litigation Hold" at the eDiscovery Speaker Series

On April 4th, Ian D. McCauley will present on the topic “The Art of the Litigation Hold" at the Capital Grille in Philadelphia.  The session is part of Driven’s eDiscovery Speaker Series.  Other speakers at the event include Scott Milner of Morgan Lewis and Tara Emory of Driven.  The talk will focus on the basic requirements for establishing a defensible litigation hold process and the state of the law on litigation holds in 2017.  To learn more, please click here.  

Ian D. McCauley will speak at DSBA Labor and Employment Law Update

On Tuesday, March 28th, Ian D. McCauley will speak at the Delaware State Bar Association’s Labor and Employment Update 2017.   Ian will discuss the 2015 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the scope and process of litigation holds, and practical tips for E-Discovery success. To learn more about the event, please click here.

Looking Back on 2015: The 6 Most Important eDiscovery Cases in Delaware - Part 3

This is the third in a series of posts summarizing the 6 most important eDiscovery cases in Delaware in 2015.

Pfizer, Inc. v. Amgen Fremont Inc., C.A. No. 10667-VCL, Hearing on Cross Motions to Compel and Rulings of the Court, July 6, 2015. More ›

Use of Agreed-Upon Search Terms Not Proxy for Gathering All Responsive Info

Parties typically seek to narrow the scope of potentially responsive documents by meeting and conferring and reaching agreement on appropriate search terms. The parties next run those search terms against the data collected from the relevant custodians and review the resulting information for responsiveness. This method of identifying responsive electronic data has more or less become the norm in cases involving large data collection efforts. Occasionally, however, search terms miss the mark and fail to capture the information the opposing party is entitled to receive. The Delaware Court of Chancery recently addressed this and other related issues in deciding motions to compel filed by the defendant in BTG International v. Wellstat Therapeutics, No. 12562-VCL (Oct. 4). More ›

Looking Back on 2015: The 6 Most Important eDiscovery Cases in Delaware - Part 2

This is the second in a series of posts summarizing the 6 most important eDiscovery cases in Delaware in 2015.

Flax v. Pet360, Inc., C.A. No. 10123-VCL, Oral Argument on Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Sanctions and Rulings of the Court, June 29, 2015. More ›

Ian D. McCauley Serves as a Panelist at the Masters Conference “Legal Project Management”

Ian D. McCauley served on the panel “Legal Project Management” at the 10th anniversary of the Masters Conference in Washington D.C. on Tuesday, October 18, 2016. The panel discussed project management throughout the discovery process and the various ways in which law firms, clients, and vendors interact to achieve successful results. For more information please click here.

Spotlight on Exterro’s E-Discovery Case Law Library

Exterro’s E-Discovery Case Law Library is a worthwhile resource for all eDiscovery professionals and any attorneys interested in learning more about such issues as new data types, proportionality, and reasonableness.  It features a collection of simple and easy to understand analyses of the most significant eDiscovery case law throughout the country.  Our blog was recently highlighted in the library, where we provide our analysis on the GN Netcom, Inc. v. Plantronics, Inc. case.

http://www.exterro.com/case-law-library/proportionality/gn-netcom-inc-v-plantronics-inc/

Delaware District Court Interprets Amended FRCP

The first Delaware opinion that has been issued that addresses either sanctions or proportionality under the new Federal Rules is GN Netcom, Inc. v. Plantronics, Inc.[1] Plaintiff GN Netcom, Inc. (“GN”) filed a motion for sanctions against defendant Plantronics, Inc. (“Plantronics”) after a long discovery dispute that centered around the “intentional and admitted deletion of emails” by one of Plantronics’s senior executives and his directives to other members of his team to delete emails. More ›

Best Lawyers® 2017 Recognizes 20 Morris James Attorneys

Twenty Morris James attorneys in twenty-six practice areas were selected by their peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America 2017 edition. Morris James also has been recognized in four new practice areas, Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants, Arbitration, Corporate Governance Law and Mediation.  The Best Lawyers® list is based on an extensive survey involving detailed evaluations of leading lawyers by their peers. More ›

Looking Back on 2015: The 6 Most Important eDiscovery Cases in Delaware - Part 1

This is the first in a series of posts summarizing the 6 most important eDiscovery cases in Delaware in 2015.

In re: ISN Software Corporation Appraisal Litigation, C.A. No. 8388–VCG, Oral Argument on Petitioners Motion to Compel and Partial Rulings of the Court, April 27, 2015. More ›

Ian D. McCauley Appears as a Panelist at the Masters Conference

Ian D. McCauley served on the panel “From Case Management to Case Intelligence: Surfacing Legal Business Intelligence” at the Masters Conference in New York on Monday, July 11, 2016 More ›

Chambers USA Recognizes 14 Morris James Attorneys and 5 Practice Areas Among the Nation’s Best

Posted In News

Morris James is pleased to announce that fourteen of its partners and five practice areas have been recognized by Chambers USA 2016.  More ›

Looking Back on 2015: The 6 Most Important eDiscovery Cases in Delaware

2015 saw continued interest by the Delaware courts in various aspects of eDiscovery.  The courts dealt with broad issues, such as spoliation and general discovery misconduct, while also focusing on narrower issues, such as document review and redactions.

This blog will be summarizing these 6 cases in more depth throughout the rest of 2016.  The 6 cases that will be summarized are below: More ›