Court Of Chancery Interprets Credit Agreement And Declines To Consider Alleged Oral Modification
Posted In Breach of Contract
Pine River Master Fund Ltd. V. Amur Finance Co., Inc., C.A. No. 2017-0145-JRS (Oct. 12, 2017)
This decision interpreting a credit agreement’s terms is another reminder that an alleged oral modification to a written contract will not vary the contract’s terms when it has an integration clause and otherwise speaks to the subject of the modification.
Tags: Breach of Contract
Share