Showing 120 posts in Jurisdiction.
Court Of Chancery Explains Conspiracy Theory Of Jurisdiction
Court Of Chancery Explains Equitable Estoppel Jurisdiction
Court Of Chancery Explains Pro Se Procedure
Court Of Chancery Upholds Jurisdiction Over Non-resident Manager
Court Of Chancery Explains The Conspiracy Theory Of Jurisdiction
District Court Reviews Website As Basis For Jurisdiction
Court Of Chancery Upholds Service By Mail
Sustainable Energy Generation Group v. Photon Energy Projects B.V., C.A. 8524-VCP (May 30, 2014)
This decision upholds service of process by mail under the Hague Convention.
ShareCourt Of Chancery Retains Suit After Martinez Ruling
VTB Bank v. Navitron Projects Corp,. C.A. 8514-VCN (April 28, 2014)
After the Delaware Supreme Court's Martinez decision dismissing a case on forum grounds, some thought that Delaware might reject other cases as well. This decision limits Martinez's scope and makes it clear that Delaware entities will be subject to Delaware jurisdiction in the circumstances where the activities of the entity "implicates [the Court of Chancery's] fundamental and immutable responsibility to supervise the entities chartered and formed under Delaware law." While that mandate is clearly limited to some set of cases less than the universe of disputes a corporation may be subject to, what is covered remains to be seen.
ShareDistrict Court Clarifies Who Is A Manager
Wakley Limited v. Ensotran LLC, C.A. 12-728-GMS (March 18, 2014)
Under the Delaware LLC Act, a manager or a person who acts like a manager is subject to jurisdiction in Delaware in a breach of duty case arising out of her management. Because the LLC agreement usually sets out who is a "manager," that is usually not disputed. However, it is often less clear who had exercised management duties sufficient to be subject to jurisdiction in Delaware. This decision helps decide that question. It points out that just being named an officer is not enough to submit to jurisdiction and that the nature of the defendant's' duties compared to what it is alleged she did improperly may also be determinative. In other words, if you "managed" X project but are sued for what you did on the Y project, there is no jurisdiction over you..
ShareCourt Of Chancery Clarifies Jurisdiction
Darby Emerging Markets Fund L.P. v. Ryan, C.A. 8381-VCP (November 27, 2013)
This decision clarifies the Court of Chancery's jurisdiction under the clean up doctrine and when a contract subject to specific performance has not yet been breached.
ShareCourt Of Chancery Explains Conspiracy Jurisdiction
Lake Treasure Holdings Ltd. v. Foundry Hill GP LLC, C.A. 6546-VCL (November 21, 2013)
The so-called conspiracy theory of jurisdiction over a non-resident is often misunderstood. This decision is useful because: (1) it explains the relationship between jurisdictional discovery and the burden of alleging facts sufficient to establish jurisdiction and (2) it again explains what must be shown to warrant jurisdiction under the conspiracy theory.
ShareCourt Of Chancery Explains Limits Of Jurisdiction Over Foreign Entities
Baier De Adler v. Upper New York Investment Companies LLC, C.A. 6896-VCN (October 31, 2013)
This is an interesting decision dealing with jurisdiction over foreign entities. The Court will not take jurisdiction when the assets involved are located outside the US and not owned by a Delaware entity
ShareCourt Of Chancery Again Explains Conspiracy Theory Of Jurisdiction
Microsoft Corporation v. Amphus, Inc., C.A. 8092-VCP (October 31, 2013)
The alter ego and conspiracy theories of jurisdiction are among the hardest to understand. This decision carefully and clearly applies those theories to a complicated fact pattern.
ShareCourt Of Chancery Upholds Forum Selection Bylaw
Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v. Chevron Corporation, C.A. 7220-CS (June 25, 2013)
The Court of Chancery has upheld a bylaw that selects Delaware as the only forum for internal corporate disputes. The Court did leave open the possibility that such a bylaw might be later challenged on narrow grounds that it was improper in limited circumstances.
ShareSupreme Court Reinvigorates Istituto Bancario
Matthew v. Flakt Woods Group SA, No. 150, 2012 ( November 20, 2012)
For some time the conspiracy theory of jurisdiction, first set out in the famous Istituto Bancario decision, has had little success in conferring jurisdiction over foreign entities. With this new decision by the Delaware Supreme Court, that trend may be reversed. The key holding is that the defendant should have known that it was involved with a Delaware corporation and the dissolution of that company as part of the alleged conspiracy was enough to give jurisdiction over the non-US defendant. While the parameters of this possible extension of jurisdiction are to be determined later, it may be very broad.
Share