Court of Chancery Explains When Directors Are Interested In The Deal
In Re Primedia Inc. Derivative Litigation, C.A. No. 1808-N (Del. Ch. November 15, 2006).
This case dealt with when directors would be considered interested in a deal so as to preclude the application of the business judgment rule and permit the suit to proceed. Many of the directors were affiliated with the controlling stockholder who had purchased the corporation's preferred stock at a deep discount just before the board voted to redeem that stock at its face value. That decision was justified, it was argued, because the coupon rate on the stock was higher than market rate. The Court held that might well be so, but at the pleading stage it was too soon to accept that as a justification for the purchase that gave the controlling stockholder a big gain. The decision is particularly interesting for its discussion of when directors are considered sufficiently connected to a controlling stockholder so as to preclude application of the business judgment rule.The decision is also interesting for its comment that if the duty of loyalty was breached here, then even if there were no real damages because of the benefit the entity received from the transaction, that a cause of action might still exist. This is consistent with recent Delaware Supreme Court rulings that duty of loyalty claims are particularly favored for judicial intervention.Share