Court Of Chancery Explains The “Known Looter” Theory For Controllers
Posted In Fiduciary Duty
Ford v. VMware Inc., C.A. No.11714-VCL (May 2, 2017)
This is an interesting decision because it examines an intriguing legal theory for holding a controlling stockholder liable in a sale: the “known looter” theory. Generally speaking, controllers can sell their stock to whoever they want. After all, why be a controller unless you have the right to exercise control free from liability for doing so. But, as this decision points out, there are limits, such as selling to a known looter who in fact ends up looting the company. Along the same lines, directors may be liable for failing to protect the company against a controller’s sale to a known looter.
Tags: fiduciary dutiesShare