About This Blog
Summaries and analysis of recent Delaware court decisions concerning business-related litigation.
Subscribe to Blog
JDSupra RSS
Join us on LinkedIn
Follow us on TwitterTopics
Top Posts
Top News
- February 19, 2021
- October 30, 2020
- April 1, 2024
Archives
Morris James Blogs
Showing 65 posts in Discovery.
Court of Chancery Addresses Discovery Abuses
Terramar Retail Centers LLC v. Marion #2-Seaport Trust, C.A. No 12875-VCL (Del. Ch. Dec. 4, 2018)
The Court of Chancery has long demanded that litigants abide by the discovery rules and respect scheduling orders. This is an excellent summary of Delaware discovery obligations and a good list of many ways a litigant can go wrong in responding to discovery. More ›
ShareCourt Of Chancery Explains Privilege Limits Involving Corporate Investigations
Akorn Inc. v. Fresemus Kabi A.G., C.A. 2018-0300-JTL (May 22, 2018) and Sandys v. Pincus, C.A. 9512-CB (July 2, 2018)
Corporate investigations present complicated issue surrounding what must later be produced in litigation. Context means everything in those disputes. Discovery into the decision by a SLC is much more limited than in other litigation, for example. But these two transcript rulings are useful for their insights into how the Court of Chancery handles disputes over discovery into the investigation process. More ›
ShareCourt of Chancery Addresses Discovery Obligations Regarding Text Messages
In re Appraisal of Kate Spade Company, C.A. No. 2017-0714-AGB (Del. Ch. June 21, 2018)
The duty to collect and produce non-privileged relevant information extends beyond email to text messages and other forms of electronic communications. Standard practice in Delaware involves at least inquiring of custodians the extent to which they used text messages to engage in substantive communications on potentially relevant topics and to collect text message data when they answer affirmatively, absent an agreement to contrary between the parties. This bench ruling addresses that practice and reflects the Chancellor’s view that text messages often may be a critical source of information.
ShareDelaware Superior Court Explains Impact Of European Data Rules On Forum Motion
Under the Cryo-Maid decision, a forum non conveniens motion must consider the impact on a defendant forced to litigate in Delaware when discovery is needed in a foreign land. Here the Court considered the impact of the recent amendments to the Italian Data Protection Code on discovery and found that it did not impose an undue hardship under the facts present in this case. This may become more important as those European laws on privacy protection start to be considered for their effect on litigation outside of the EU.
ShareCourt of Chancery Explains Investment Bankers’ Discovery Obligations
Cumming v. Edens, C.A. No. 13007-VCS (Del. Ch. July 12, 2018)
This transcript ruling makes two important points about discovery obligations in the Court of Chancery. First, blanket form objections to document requests amount to a waiver of otherwise valid objections. Objections to scope and burden and the like need to be spelled out specifically with supporting facts. Second, investment bankers, even as third parties to a litigation, generally will not get far with objecting to requests on the basis of burden. Given their role in many transactions, they are front and center, house a lot of critically relevant information, and have been paid well enough to cover the expenses associated with production. In short, they are not your typical third party who may be given some more leeway when it comes to discovery burdens.
ShareCourt Of Chancery Denies Garner Exception Absent A Fiduciary Duty
Morris v. Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP C.A. 12110-VCG (May 7, 2018)
The famous Garner case permits inspection of otherwise privileged communications when its strict criteria are satisfied. But as this decision decides for the first time in Delaware, Garner does not apply when there is no fiduciary relationship between the party seeking discovery and the party claiming the privilege. Here the LLP agreement waived any fiduciary duties. Thus, Garner did not apply and discovery was denied.
ShareCourt Of Chancery Imposes Sanctions For Failing To Comply With A Scheduling Order
In RE Examworks Group Inc. Stockholder Appraisal Litigation, C.A. 12688-VCL (February 21, 2018)
As this decision again points out, a scheduling order is a court order that must be followed or sanctions will be imposed. Late production of documents is just such a sanctionable event.
ShareCourt Of Chancery Explains Discovery Objections
In Re Oxbow Carbon LLC Unitholder Litigation, C.A. No. 12447-VCL (March 13, 2017)
For some time now, the Court of Chancery has told litigants that objections to documents requests should be specific, not generic and boilerplate. This decision thoroughly addresses the case law on this issue, with numerous citations to federal court precedent and detailed explanations of what objections are proper, including for claims of privilege. Oxbow should serve as a useful resource when it comes time to object to document requests in the Court of Chancery.
ShareCourt Of Chancery Addresses M&A Discovery
Hamilton Partners L.P. v. Highland Capital Management L.P., C.A. 6547-VCN (February 2, 2016)
Discovery of financial information in M&A litigation, including appraisal actions, often involves two issues: (1) how far back before the transaction should there be discovery and (2) is post-transaction discovery permitted? This decision provides some guidance on both issues.
ShareCourt Of Chancery Applies Wal-Mart Decision
Kops v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, C.A. 10102-VCG (Transcript, July 16, 2015)
This recently released transcript has a good explanation of how to apply the Garner/Wal-Mart principles governing when stockholders may get discovery of documents otherwise subject to the attorney-client privilege. The multiple facts involved, particularly in a Section 220 case, tend to permit such discovery when the issue is whether demand is excused to file a derivative suit. More ›
ShareCourt Of Chancery Clarifies Privilege Waiver And Redaction Rules
TCV VI L.P. v. TradingScreen Inc., C.A. 10164-VCN (September 25, 2015)
This an excellent review of the scope of a waiver of the attorney client privilege and it harmonizes conflicting prior decisions. It also is a good outline of what must be in a redaction log.
ShareCourt Of Chancery Outlines Discovery In Books and Records Case
Chammas v. NavLink Inc., C.A. 11265-VCN (August 27, 2015)
What discovery is permitted in a books and records case has two dimensions. More ›
ShareCourt Of Chancery Affirms Power To Order Discovery Abroad
In re Activision Blizzard Inc. Stockholder Litigation, C.A. 8885-VCL (February 21, 2014)
Some countries, particularly in Europe, have laws that restrict the ability to get discovery of email and other materials. This careful decision explains when the Court of Chancery will order that discovery anyway. The opinion reviews the United States Supreme Court decisions and the laws of France on this subject.
ShareCourt Of Chancery Gets Tough On Delay
Sustainable Biofuels Solutions LLC v. Tekgar LLC, C.A. 8741-VCP (January 28, 2014)
Delays in discovery that affect the trial date will get a litigant in trouble with the Court. The Delaware Supreme Court has made this clear and required that scheduling orders be followed. This transcript makes this clear.
ShareCourt Of Chancery Explains "Inadvertent" Disclosures
Jefferson v Dominion Holdings Inc., C.A. 8663-VCN (December 13, 2013)
The term "inadvertent" is frequently used in confidentiality and quick-peek agreements to permit the claw back of privileged documents that have been "inadvertently" produced. In a rare case, the Court of Chancery concluded that there was inadvertent production, even though the documents were used in questioning a witness.
Share
