About This Blog
Summaries and analysis of recent Delaware court decisions concerning business-related litigation.
Morris James Blogs
Court of Chancery Enforces the Absolute Litigation Privilege
The absolute litigation privilege is an affirmative defense that bars claims arising from statements made in the course of a judicial proceeding. Here, the Delaware Court of Chancery addressed the scope of the absolute litigation privilege in response to a request for an injunction to bar defendant from prospectively disparaging plaintiff in other litigation. The agreements governing an investment by defendant in the plaintiff’s funds contained confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses. A falling out between the parties resulted in years of protracted litigation in Illinois and Delaware. This Court of Chancery action for breach of confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses in the controlling agreements is based on information disclosed in the prior actions.
Defendant asserted that plaintiff’s non-disparagement claim was barred by the absolute litigation privilege. In contrast to seeking money damages for a prior disparaging statement, plaintiff sought to prospectively enjoin defendant from breaching the non-disparagement clause in related litigation through an injunction. The Chancery Court rejected application of the non-disparagement clause to bar prospective statements in other litigation. The Court reasoned that the proposed application would potentially allow a party to enjoin its counterparty from prosecuting a claim by prospectively labeling all potential adverse statements as disparaging. The Court also observed that its equitable powers to enjoin future misconduct generally should not be used as a prior restraint on speech. In addition to dismissing the non-disparagement claim, the Court also dismissed plaintiff’s claim for breach of a confidentiality provision for lack of standing because the alleged confidential information did not belong to plaintiff.